filthyyuckysteveandbucky

quixotess:

telegantmess:

jemimaaslana:

bittergrapes:

wanmaru:

Black/asian/latino/etcetera people: no objective inferiority; discrimination based on ungrounded prejudice

Homosexual/bisexual/etcetera people: no objective inferiority; discrimination based on ungrounded prejudice

Transgender/genderqueer/etcetera people: no objective inferiority; discrimination based on ungrounded prejudice


You need to stop comparing discrimination based on these traits to “ableism” or “fatphobia”, Tumblr. Abilities aren’t social constructs. Being able to see IS objectively better than being blind, being able to walk is objectively better than being unable to walk, being physically fit is always good thing better than not being fit. It’s sensible to say that abilities don’t determine your worth as a human being, but having abilities is objectively better than not having them as they grant the individual a higher degree of freedom and choice. If you gained the ability to fly it would be a good thing, regardless of the situation.

bahahahaahahaha

ahahahah

ahahahahahah

ahahahahahahahaHAHAHAAH

no.

The reason that disabilities are disabilities is because the society in which they live inordinately favors people whose bodies can do certain things over people whose bodies cannot.

Let me give you an example. There have been several cases where the blind have been able to teach themselves to use a form of echolocation to orient themselves. Imagine if society were then constructed to favor people who can use echolocation: buildings no longer had lights in them because it was assumed that people would know where to go regardless of how light it was, and signs were only in Braille. Everything was touch-friendly but not sight-friendly because it’s expected that people will be touching things to figure it out, but not seeing them.

Suddenly, having vision and not echolocation is a disability. You are subjectively inferior because your society has subjectively chosen to favor this one skill or ability over another, and you therefore face discrimination based on ungrounded prejudice that sighted people are weird or gross or bad.

“But I can see! Objectively this is better than echolocation!” You’ll say. “I can see where I’m going and can orient myself by sight instead of by touch or echolocation!” But it doesn’t matter, because this hypothetical society wasn’t built to suit you.

Disabled people have some incredible skills that many temporarily able-bodied people don’t. For example, many people I’ve interacted with who use wheelchairs for mobility have some of the best proprioception I’ve ever seen; they can literally turn on a dime because they’ve used a wheelchair for so long that it’s simply become part of their person and they account for it accordingly. Autistics like myself can logic ourselves out of a paper bag. And the list goes on. But because our society favors certain skills over others, these things don’t matter, and they are still considered disabled because of the one or two senses or processes that don’t work in the commonly accepted way. That is why it’s ableism. Because no body is better than another, and you ‘objectively’ thinking that some are is pretty hateful.

^^ Commentary <3

Exactly.

Also, lol@ fat=/=physically fit.

I think a purely social model of disability is overly simplistic. Not everyone who wishes they didn’t have X disability has been brainwashed by society, you know, and not everyone with disabilities would agree that their disability has conferred on them an equal advantage. (I find the echolocation example pretty peculiar given how few blind people can do it. Edit: also since echolocation uses sound, not touch…) I also kind of think the emphasis on disabilities as a natural human variation, while important, can obscure the artificial causes of disability; for example, why do so many people have cancer? Why do so many people have asthma? Why do so many people have diabetes?

OP is still pretty rich given historic and current arguments about “objective inferiority” of non-white people, women, etc. White nationalists for example still argue that IQ testing proves that Black people are less smart than white people, incarceration rates prove they are less civilized, etc.

Don’t put those terms in scare quotes, dickbag. They’re fucking real, as you have so perfectly shown us. I’ve got nothing to add to the perfect commentary re: ableism above, so let me just say this:

being fit does not necessarily equal skinny / being fat does not necessarily equal not being fit / what is the definition of fit? / who decides that? / fuck you

  1. verhexen reblogged this from picturaculminis
  2. picturaculminis reblogged this from xmasandribena
  3. xmasandribena reblogged this from punlich
  4. shiisa reblogged this from shisaa
  5. lilylunastardust reblogged this from falsettofetish and added:
    It’s always nice to wake up and hear you’re objectively inferior. Really brightens the day. You should inform the...
  6. shisaa reblogged this from shiisa and added:
    Hmmm. Don’t really know what to think of this post tbh. I think the original poster is obviously doesn’t see a lot of...
  7. falsettofetish reblogged this from raggedyanndy
  8. raggedyanndy reblogged this from filthyyuckysteveandbucky and added:
    Don’t put those terms in scare quotes, dickbag. They’re fucking real, as you have so perfectly shown us. I’ve got...
  9. lauradefendszeearth reblogged this from setdreadstostun
  10. filthyyuckysteveandbucky reblogged this from t-akver
  11. t-akver reblogged this from telegantmess and added:
    I think a purely social model of disability is overly simplistic. Not everyone who wishes they didn’t have X disability...
  12. confidencebucket reblogged this from corrupter-of-words and added:
    DISABILITY IS ALSO SOCIALLY CONSTRUCTED. that is all.
  13. femme-unculus reblogged this from gaynxiety and added:
    *Applause for commentary*
  14. sea-tidesofthesoul reblogged this from corrupter-of-words
  15. corrupter-of-words reblogged this from bobamuel and added:
    ^ this right here. all about the commentary.
  16. suchsmallhands reblogged this from bobamuel and added:
    This.
  17. bobamuel reblogged this from sandyfarquhar
  18. wanmaru reblogged this from livelaughawesome and added:
    Blind people don’t have a choice, they HAVE to be blind. A person with working eyes can claw his or her eyes out...
  19. setdreadstostun reblogged this from ileolai
  20. theweirdingway reblogged this from conjuringseed and added:
    Wow
  21. kdangerinspace reblogged this from wanmaru and added:
    hoooooooooold on there No, able-bodiedness and thinness are not actually objectively better than disability and fatness....
  22. autiecommie reblogged this from tal9000 and added:
    I’m really glad that someone finally spelled this out articulately, because I have been failing at explaining this...
  23. neednothavehappenedtobetrue reblogged this from sandyfarquhar
  24. ileolai reblogged this from tal9000 and added:
    Being sighted is “objectively better” are you actually serious right now.
  25. baskingsunflower reblogged this from livelaughawesome
  26. nonary reblogged this from softurl
  27. livelaughawesome reblogged this from softurl and added:
    Saying that being able to see is better than being blind because life is just easier is exactly the same thing as saying...
  28. pedertastic reblogged this from sandyfarquhar and added:
    So compelling
  29. apatheticfan reblogged this from punlich
  30. tal9000 reblogged this from punlich